<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Week From Now: SolidWorks 2009 MADNESS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-2009-news-features-review/2008-07-28/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-2009-news-features-review/2008-07-28/</link>
	<description>Rockin&#039; SolidWorks 3D CAD CAM and Engineering Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 07:29:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darkfall forum</title>
		<link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-2009-news-features-review/2008-07-28/comment-page-1/#comment-12272</link>
		<dc:creator>Darkfall forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 02:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidsmack.com/?p=1478#comment-12272</guid>
		<description>Disaster incoming...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disaster incoming&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uo gold</title>
		<link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-2009-news-features-review/2008-07-28/comment-page-1/#comment-11682</link>
		<dc:creator>uo gold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidsmack.com/?p=1478#comment-11682</guid>
		<description>I have no real specific improvements I am wondering about, just if the overall feel has been made better.I hope that the uproar from that got the attention of the interface designers at SW to listen to users input and complaints to implement changes suggested by the users to make it work better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no real specific improvements I am wondering about, just if the overall feel has been made better.I hope that the uproar from that got the attention of the interface designers at SW to listen to users input and complaints to implement changes suggested by the users to make it work better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valshnar</title>
		<link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-2009-news-features-review/2008-07-28/comment-page-1/#comment-10598</link>
		<dc:creator>Valshnar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 07:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidsmack.com/?p=1478#comment-10598</guid>
		<description>Most of us just wonder one thing...will sw2009 actually work or will it be another disaster like 2008?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The best new feature -- selective open -- didn&#039;t actually work in the crunch on my massive assembly.  Crashed instantly when trying to create a drawing.   Over and over.  Sigh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Noteworthy achievements of SW2008:&lt;br&gt;most bug-plagued release since &#039;96&lt;br&gt;wins the award for the WORST admin image creation process ever.  (Got me to seriously consider doing all 100+ installations manually)&lt;br&gt;Created more SW hatemail within the company than the last 5 releases combined (on the plus side - inspired me to create a virtual email account to capture it all)&lt;br&gt;Pissed off more engineers in our company than any other software release...ever!  Hands down.  (beating out all versions of CATIA)&lt;br&gt;BIGGEST, FATTEST AND SLOWEST SW ever!  Yahoo!  Whatever happened to speed?  My old laptop screamed along pretty well with SW2007.  With 2008 it just barely runs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way, what A$$HOLE came up with the special DVDs that can&#039;t be copied through any normal process?  Would that be the same guy that decided not to release service packs on DVD?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My decade long love affair with SW has at last come to an end.   After buying our first seats, selling it internally for year after year and coaxing along the reluctant...I&#039;m done.  I&#039;ve sluffed off my thankless admin tasks to an intern.  We have a seat of NX now.  We&#039;ll play around with SolidEdge a bit and keep an eye on some of the new interesting products that are out.  It looks like SW is now all about listing as many features as possible regardless of how many actually work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lots of good people and talent at SW.  Wish they could breath life back into this once-great product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of us just wonder one thing&#8230;will sw2009 actually work or will it be another disaster like 2008?</p>
<p>The best new feature &#8212; selective open &#8212; didn&#39;t actually work in the crunch on my massive assembly.  Crashed instantly when trying to create a drawing.   Over and over.  Sigh.</p>
<p>Noteworthy achievements of SW2008:<br />most bug-plagued release since &#39;96<br />wins the award for the WORST admin image creation process ever.  (Got me to seriously consider doing all 100+ installations manually)<br />Created more SW hatemail within the company than the last 5 releases combined (on the plus side &#8211; inspired me to create a virtual email account to capture it all)<br />Pissed off more engineers in our company than any other software release&#8230;ever!  Hands down.  (beating out all versions of CATIA)<br />BIGGEST, FATTEST AND SLOWEST SW ever!  Yahoo!  Whatever happened to speed?  My old laptop screamed along pretty well with SW2007.  With 2008 it just barely runs.</p>
<p>By the way, what A$$HOLE came up with the special DVDs that can&#39;t be copied through any normal process?  Would that be the same guy that decided not to release service packs on DVD?</p>
<p>My decade long love affair with SW has at last come to an end.   After buying our first seats, selling it internally for year after year and coaxing along the reluctant&#8230;I&#39;m done.  I&#39;ve sluffed off my thankless admin tasks to an intern.  We have a seat of NX now.  We&#39;ll play around with SolidEdge a bit and keep an eye on some of the new interesting products that are out.  It looks like SW is now all about listing as many features as possible regardless of how many actually work.</p>
<p>Lots of good people and talent at SW.  Wish they could breath life back into this once-great product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikepaauwe</title>
		<link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-2009-news-features-review/2008-07-28/comment-page-1/#comment-9429</link>
		<dc:creator>mikepaauwe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 19:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidsmack.com/?p=1478#comment-9429</guid>
		<description>SolidWorks 2009 Pre-Release. Monday?…We Meant Tuesday. Or was that Wednesday?&lt;br&gt;Deja Vu anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SolidWorks 2009 Pre-Release. Monday?…We Meant Tuesday. Or was that Wednesday?<br />Deja Vu anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Whatmough</title>
		<link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-2009-news-features-review/2008-07-28/comment-page-1/#comment-9428</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Whatmough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidsmack.com/?p=1478#comment-9428</guid>
		<description>Hey Josh&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cograts on beeing featured in teh SolidWorks Newsletter.. you deserve it your Blog ROCKS!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Josh</p>
<p>Cograts on beeing featured in teh SolidWorks Newsletter.. you deserve it your Blog ROCKS!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uttam Chaurasiya</title>
		<link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-2009-news-features-review/2008-07-28/comment-page-1/#comment-9426</link>
		<dc:creator>Uttam Chaurasiya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidsmack.com/?p=1478#comment-9426</guid>
		<description>Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod_Uding</title>
		<link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-2009-news-features-review/2008-07-28/comment-page-1/#comment-9425</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod_Uding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidsmack.com/?p=1478#comment-9425</guid>
		<description>Since we did not get to upgrade to 2008 (We will in August), I only heard and read about almost everyone despising the new interface that came out with 2008.  I hope that the uproar from that got the attention of the interface designers at SW to listen to users input and complaints to implement changes suggested by the users to make it work better.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have no real specific improvements I am wondering about, just if the overall feel has been made better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since we did not get to upgrade to 2008 (We will in August), I only heard and read about almost everyone despising the new interface that came out with 2008.  I hope that the uproar from that got the attention of the interface designers at SW to listen to users input and complaints to implement changes suggested by the users to make it work better.</p>
<p>I have no real specific improvements I am wondering about, just if the overall feel has been made better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-2009-news-features-review/2008-07-28/comment-page-1/#comment-9427</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidsmack.com/?p=1478#comment-9427</guid>
		<description>I have not had a chance to play with 2009 a lot but I hope the Weldments feature will be expanded on. Especially how it handles cut-lists. Would be great if you could treat a weldment (or multi-body) part as an assembly - with features such as limited section cuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not had a chance to play with 2009 a lot but I hope the Weldments feature will be expanded on. Especially how it handles cut-lists. Would be great if you could treat a weldment (or multi-body) part as an assembly &#8211; with features such as limited section cuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-2009-news-features-review/2008-07-28/comment-page-1/#comment-9424</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidsmack.com/?p=1478#comment-9424</guid>
		<description>Will 09 be more stable and have fewer bugs?  Please say yes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will 09 be more stable and have fewer bugs?  Please say yes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigmikeo</title>
		<link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-2009-news-features-review/2008-07-28/comment-page-1/#comment-9423</link>
		<dc:creator>bigmikeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidsmack.com/?p=1478#comment-9423</guid>
		<description>Speed Scotty I need more speed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speed Scotty I need more speed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
