<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dassault V6 Crumbles AntiSocial CAD and PLM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.solidsmack.com/dassault-v6-crumbles-antisocial-cad-and-plm/2008-06-02/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.solidsmack.com/dassault-v6-crumbles-antisocial-cad-and-plm/2008-06-02/</link>
	<description>Rockin&#039; SolidWorks 3D CAD CAM and Engineering Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:16:50 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.solidsmack.com/dassault-v6-crumbles-antisocial-cad-and-plm/2008-06-02/comment-page-1/#comment-11015</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidsmack.com/?p=1258#comment-11015</guid>
		<description>anyone has try this? please comment about this, I need to know. Thanks&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheer,&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://the-soa.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;The SOA&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anyone has try this? please comment about this, I need to know. Thanks</p>
<p>Cheer,<br /><a href="http://the-soa.blogspot.com">The SOA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrek Cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.solidsmack.com/dassault-v6-crumbles-antisocial-cad-and-plm/2008-06-02/comment-page-1/#comment-10123</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrek Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidsmack.com/?p=1258#comment-10123</guid>
		<description>I agree that they are surely stirring up things more than the typical &quot;next best thing&quot; announcement. I work with all of the CAD programs almost on a daily basis. CATIA is a monster. Sure it can do some a amazing stuff, but you have to be a pretty amazing CAD person to figure all of it out as it is well, &quot;CATIA&quot;. Almost everyone fan or foe will acknowledge that it is &quot;just difffernt&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, I am psyched to see them turning it up a bit. I think leveraging the web in a 2.0 kind of way is long overdue for the industry. Interesting points you made on the Matrix side as I am unfamiliar with their technology.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;derrek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that they are surely stirring up things more than the typical &#8220;next best thing&#8221; announcement. I work with all of the CAD programs almost on a daily basis. CATIA is a monster. Sure it can do some a amazing stuff, but you have to be a pretty amazing CAD person to figure all of it out as it is well, &#8220;CATIA&#8221;. Almost everyone fan or foe will acknowledge that it is &#8220;just difffernt&#8221;</p>
<p>So, I am psyched to see them turning it up a bit. I think leveraging the web in a 2.0 kind of way is long overdue for the industry. Interesting points you made on the Matrix side as I am unfamiliar with their technology.</p>
<p>derrek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrek Cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.solidsmack.com/dassault-v6-crumbles-antisocial-cad-and-plm/2008-06-02/comment-page-1/#comment-6516</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrek Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidsmack.com/?p=1258#comment-6516</guid>
		<description>I agree that they are surely stirring up things more than the typical &quot;next best thing&quot; announcement. I work with all of the CAD programs almost on a daily basis. CATIA is a monster. Sure it can do some a amazing stuff, but you have to be a pretty amazing CAD person to figure all of it out as it is well, &quot;CATIA&quot;. Almost everyone fan or foe will acknowledge that it is &quot;just difffernt&quot;

So, I am psyched to see them turning it up a bit. I think leveraging the web in a 2.0 kind of way is long overdue for the industry. Interesting points you made on the Matrix side as I am unfamiliar with their technology.

derrek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that they are surely stirring up things more than the typical &#8220;next best thing&#8221; announcement. I work with all of the CAD programs almost on a daily basis. CATIA is a monster. Sure it can do some a amazing stuff, but you have to be a pretty amazing CAD person to figure all of it out as it is well, &#8220;CATIA&#8221;. Almost everyone fan or foe will acknowledge that it is &#8220;just difffernt&#8221;</p>
<p>So, I am psyched to see them turning it up a bit. I think leveraging the web in a 2.0 kind of way is long overdue for the industry. Interesting points you made on the Matrix side as I am unfamiliar with their technology.</p>
<p>derrek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Banquer</title>
		<link>http://www.solidsmack.com/dassault-v6-crumbles-antisocial-cad-and-plm/2008-06-02/comment-page-1/#comment-6399</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Banquer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 06:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidsmack.com/?p=1258#comment-6399</guid>
		<description>&quot;My bet is that SolidWorks drops parasolids, owned by competing Siemens, to develop capabilities and interoperability within the other Dassault product lines. Why would they not want to do this?&quot;

They should have done it many years ago. I have posted about this very issue numerous times and SolidWorks users just didn&#039;t get what I was saying. SolidWorks is most likely going to spend two years just trying to catch up to where Siemens Synchronous Technology is right now. Sad but it didn&#039;t have to be this way. 

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;My bet is that SolidWorks drops parasolids, owned by competing Siemens, to develop capabilities and interoperability within the other Dassault product lines. Why would they not want to do this?&#8221;</p>
<p>They should have done it many years ago. I have posted about this very issue numerous times and SolidWorks users just didn&#8217;t get what I was saying. SolidWorks is most likely going to spend two years just trying to catch up to where Siemens Synchronous Technology is right now. Sad but it didn&#8217;t have to be this way. </p>
<p>Jon Banquer<br />
San Diego, CA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
